Dear Jim,

 

As you know, for the past few weeks I have been examining your theories regarding Crypto-Zionist agents, infiltration and deception in the anti-Zionist movement. You made lots of interesting points concerning possible agents, and I have approached this from the angle that the theories were largely correct. Many of the details remained an open question, such as whether one agent was operating multiple personae with multiple handles, or a team of agents covered for each other. I considered the latter the more probable scenario.

 

I regret to say that, following my investigations which have included speaking to some of the individuals concerned, I now believe that your ideas are far-fetched and highly unlikely. For example, James Linton is clearly not the same person as Brendon O'Connell, and the individual operating the Fester handle is yet another entity. All three have their own unique writing style, with O'Connell's spelling poor compared to Linton's, and Fester's coprophiliac tendencies revolving around excreta as opposed to Linton's alternative choice of swear words. Fester's posting times at WUFYS have been very consistent, with the gaps providing evidence that he is in the US, whereas Linton and O'Connell are in Australia.

 

My suspicion about Linton being "in the US" is easily explained by his irregular sleeping patterns. Jamie showed Suzette his home and gardens via webcam, and she could see that it was daylight. She could see the trees outside, and also saw some documents like his driving licence and ATM card.

 

It's true that Nina's position vis-a-vis Smith is not always consistent, but the same could be said of many of Smith's former supporters. The wearing of the IDF shirt is interesting, but certainly not proof that she is working for the Zionists. TFC still carries its page on NOLAJBS at http://iamthewitness.com/NOLAJBS-info.html, which also links to your NOLAJBS page, although Eric removed the link from TFC's front page. Extraordinary hypotheses, such as Nina posting under multiple handles on white nationalist forums, demand extraordinary standards of proof. The evidence presented does not prove the case.

 

Some of the Americans, such as Nina and Michael Hamme, do genuinely believe that promoting Ron Paul is a worthwhile form of activism. And Nina has even gone so far as to describe TFC as charlatans, e.g. see http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/2470#comment-10135.

 

You made some valid criticisms of Smith, such as his refusal to use Skype, and unsubstantiated claim about being threatened by a mean-looking individual. However, that is not enough to mortally wound him. Some of your conclusions have been totally wrong, as a result of an over-reliance on weak evidence, or faulty reasoning. E.g., the theory that Poseidon = debus, or Jews constitute 60% of the Mount Lawley population. And the photographic evidence refutes rather than supports the theory that Nina = Gina. I suspect there are some TFC shills at WUFYS, but some of those who speak in support of Smith, Hufschmid and Bollyn could well be genuine supporters, perhaps induced by Smith's tactic of urging his cult followers to launch counter-attacks against internet posters who criticise TFC.

 

Regarding honestabe's posting on the 1998 thread at http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/1998?page=4#comment-9794, his comment "Just watched your video" appeared at 15:46, a mere 38 minutes after I had posted a link to The French Deception video. He asks whether Suzette is one of "the good guys", or is aka Eric or Nina. I replied at 16:10, a rather brief comment pointing out that the video was a production of Michael Fugazi in association with PlanetQuo, that I believed Suzette to be an honest, genuine anti-Zionist, and that Eric and Nina were separate entities. Crimes of Zion posted a more detailed, thoughtful comment on the video at 17:08, a response which I now realise was more informative and accurate than my own. In fact, my comment was almost certainly wrong about Nina being a "team", and about the video indicating "promising" avenues of research. Then CoZ made a short, second comment about Suzette, at 17:29.

 

Honestabe posted at 20:17, thanking CoZ. That was understandable in light of the fact that CoZ's comment was more informative than my own. In addition, my reply was three comments above CoZ's, so honestabe might even have missed it. Moreover, honestabe has stated that he believes me to be a shill, right in his very first post at WUFYS in the 1154 thread: http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/1154?page=2#comment-5498. In the 1998 thread, honestabe was also sceptical that someone who looked like a "bubble head" could exhibit a deep wisdom that was indicative of someone many years her senior. Linton called honestabe "mate": (Abe, it's cool mate. She'll live.) That was after exchanges in which honestabe had offered an apology. Honestabe could be a Zionist shill, or a useful idiot.

 

Your first draft of a possible response to Suzette, as in "Stupid Suzette", shows how your theories have taken on such an overriding importance in your own imagination that you are prepared to do whatever it takes to prop them up. Theories are merely theories, but people are invariably sentient - and frequently sapient - beings. I have had theories that are total bollocks, and I drop them and move on. Look at how Edison had to try thousands of different filaments before finding one that worked. If, merely to prevent a theory from being shot down, you could contemplate sending a vitriolic response including comments such as "stupid bitch" and "go fuck yourself" to a woman whose only 'crime' was attempting to discover the truth, you are losing your way and it is time to drop the theory. Another indicator is that you rationalise your need to avoid speaking with the suspects Linton and Nina with a principle that you "do not speak with your enemies".

 

There are two obvious examples of hypocrisy in this case: 1) You accuse Hufschmid of being a cold, unfeeling, uncaring sociopath, which is probably true. Yet you are prepared to consider launching a personal attack on an innocent truth seeker who is not a Zionist agent. 2) The PlanetQuo front page carries details of Smith's "Jesus aborted" email to Suzette, implying that Smith is bad for sending the emails. Yet you are considering sending an even harsher response.

 

 

No one should be expected to jettison a theory in an instant. Nina has said she would still be prepared to speak to you. Alternatively, if you think it could be useful, here is a suggestion: I would compile a list of some of your pieces of evidence (from emails about 'coincidences', collusion, etc), and post on my site on a "secret" unlinked page. You would be given the URL in advance in order to check that it did not include something that you wanted to hold back. Then Linton and Nina would be allowed to view the page, and provide their responses. The advantage to you is that you would have feedback on which evidence was the strongest, and you could concentrate on that and eliminate the weaker material. Your theories are not 100% wrong, and this would help to identify the best points of your research and salvage any reliable conclusions.

 

The idea that Suzette has been compromised, blackmailed or threatened is ridiculous. She gives no indication of being under duress, and the Zionists would be taking a great risk if they did make such threats. Some targets would refuse to yield, and evidence could be recorded. I have made contact with Linton and Nina, and I can categorically state that I have not been coerced or induced into posing as an "anti-Zionist" who pretends to support Linton and Nina's version of events. Admittedly, I cannot be absolutely certain that they are not agents, just like I cannot be certain that Zionists have not got miniature cameras disguised as flies that can secretly record me. But I see no credible evidence that Linton and Nina are Zionist agents.

 

We should concentrate on exposing Smith, Hufschmid, Bollyn, and Zionist crimes and deceptions.

 

Regards,

 

Steve