Jim PlanetQuo Kerr has released another deliberately deceptive video, promoting his evidence-free conspiracy theories on how genuine anti-Zionists are "shills", and those who are clearly Mossad assets are really our "friends".
He starts with an accusation that I, Poseidon, have been hiding
"behind pseudonyms". However, a WHOIS
lookup for the domain planetquo.net reveals that Kerr uses an anonymous
domain service: PrivacyProtect.org of Moergestel, The Netherlands.
Unlike Kerr, I appear on the electoral roll. And whereas Kerr is in the top 500 surnames for England and Wales (and makes about 32nd place in Scotland), mine is ranked below 20,000. Hence, were I to reveal my surname, my address would be easily traced. There are many James Kerrs in the country (if that is his real name, it's interesting that his age and place of origin happen to be almost identical to those of the Simple Minds frontman. Kerr's associates and cronies such as Chris Bollyn are not noted for ability to construct sophisticated cover stories). Hence, telling the world that your name is Jim Kerr when you are not even on the electoral roll is about as informative as stating that Alex Jones is a Zionist denier.
In his "Who Are You?" article, Kerr says, "I'm for real, and will be revealing more about myself in the near future. You'll soon know all you need to know." However, this was yet another in his long line of broken promises.
Having followed my lead, Kerr is to all intents and purposes incognito. It is said that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
The webmaster of planetquo.com then goes on to assert that it is "highly probable" that I have been "operating" on the forum Wake Up From Your Slumber under multiple identities. False. Poseidon is the only handle I have used at WUFYS. He also claims that I am the poster known as UnitedAgainstZionism, another tinfoil conspiracy theory from Kerr that happens to be false. But we should let Kerr play his hand. "Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake"!
Kerr reminds us that Michael Piper (it's not a double-barrelled name "Collins-Piper", he changed his middle name to Collins, preferring it to Bernard) once called Christopher Bollyn "America's best investigative journalist bar none". However, prior to about August 2006, even those of us who now recognise that Bollyn is an intelligence asset would have agreed with that accolade. Bollyn could have been forgiven the 'mistakes' such as the "Danner sees Global Hawk" hoax, or the 'misinterpretation' of the WTC collapse seismographs. After the August 2006 arrest and Tasering, question marks about Bollyn's veracity became evident. But Piper was still supporting Bollyn in September 2006, before AFP fired Bollyn in October for the unreliability of his reports and for his disloyalty to his employers. By the fall of 2006, it was pretty clear that Bollyn was either a nut or a shill. Evidence continued to pour in of Bollyn and Hufschmid's duplicity, confirming that they were shills rather than useful idiots.
Kerr continues to bang on about how Bollyn states that Zionists did 9/11, and of course that is one of Bollyn's true statements. However, consider the Zionists' Protocol Number 12:
I BEG YOU TO NOTE THAT AMONG THOSE MAKING ATTACKS UPON US WILL ALSO BE ORGANS ESTABLISHED BY US, BUT THEY WILL ATTACK EXCLUSIVELY POINTS THAT WE HAVE PRE-DETERMINED TO ALTER. [...]For which reason all journals published by us will be of the most opposite, in appearance, tendencies and opinions, thereby creating confidence in us and bringing over to us quite unsuspicious opponents, who will thus fall into our trap and be rendered harmless. [...]
In the third rank we shall set up our own, to all appearance, opposition, which, in at least one of its organs, will present what looks like the very antipodes to us. Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards.
If the Zionists want to gather names and addresses, provoke in-fighting and divisions in the truth movement, and to control and sabotage the anti-Zionist truth movement, then of course they are going to infiltrate the anti-Zionist movement by installing their own agents who pose as 'anti-Zionist' and 'anti-Israel'.
Bollyn's connections to Israeli intelligence - he was married to a woman who worked for Israeli military intelligence at Herzliya - and his habit of mixing half-truths and total fabrications in with good information demonstrate unequivocally that he is a shill, along with his pal Eric "Murdoch" Hufschmid. The problem for those who profess to support Bollyn and Hufschmid is that they are faced with a glaring contradiction. On the one hand, they - unlike Joe Sixpack who gets all his information from the Zionist-controlled mainstream media - are supposed to be smart enough to figure out that the Zionists did 9/11. Yet, they are simultaneously silly enough to be fooled by the likes of Bollyn and Hufschmid.
Then we have respected journalists such as Robert Fisk, who expose some Zionist crimes. As early as February 2003 he was showing how the Zionists were pushing for "regime change" in Iraq well before 9/11, as demonstrated by the 1996 report A Clean Break which shows that the Iraq war was for the benefit of Israel, rather than the US or UK. And Fisk does not simply accept the 9/11 "Arab hijackers" fable as gospel. He questions the non-sequiturs and the inconsistencies in the official story, pointing out that WTC 7 collapsed neatly to the ground when it was not even hit by a plane, and how Mohamed Atta's letter seemed phony. However, he did say that he was the Middle East correspondent rather than the "conspiracy correspondent". A journalist who came out and said that Israel did 9/11 would soon find himself out of a job.
Fisk is a better source than Bollyn, since Bollyn's material is a mixture of facts, unsubstantiated allegations, and unashamed hoaxes. Fisk will guide those who are waking up to the evils of Zionism in the right direction, and they can then research on the internet to carry on where Fisk stops. If such a person trusts the likes of Bollyn and Hufschmid, they will be deceived and misled like sheep being manipulated by Judas goats.
In his attempts to defend the indefensible, i.e. Bollyn, Kerr accepts that 9/11 is a very important issue. Indeed, 9/11 and the holohoax are the Zionists' two greatest Achilles heels. Why then, does Kerr refuse to address these issues? He publishes copy and paste jobs in his site, and includes material such as "chemtrails" for the conspiracy theorists, yet he remains strangely silent on 9/11 and the holohoax, having never contributed anything to the debate. However, if he is a shill, there is nothing strange about his silence.
Challenge for Kerr: Publish some material about 9/11 and / or the holohoax. It should be your own original work, not merely duplication of others' articles.
As for Alex Jones, he has provided some good information. He is clearly a Zionist denier. However, whether that is due to his being influenced by the way that the Zionists have managed to set up their taboos and have moulded institutions to suit themselves, or whether he is a paid shill, is anybody's guess.
Kerr, Hufschmid and Bollyn are a disgrace to the anti-Zionist movement. Fortunately, their credibility has evaporated, and their masks have become transparent. Shills R Us.